@guanlinzhou I have bio too… I think that it will be pretty general so not much studying is needed.
I know…I hope I get FRQ’s on that test that I can understand
Yeah also doing bio…the newer released mc that we’ve been doing is a lot of reading but pretty straightforward once you know what they’re talking about…I’m more concerned about the FRQs
the released FRQ’s seem pretty easy though
I took a practice exam for bio and I got 54/58 on the MC
but i totally failed the frq because it was completely confusing
i’ll probably take a practice test and be done with it
Yeah, 53/58 here (though we should probably talk about bio on another thread now that I think of it)
Do you all remember that one really ridicoulous question from this years exam. I have a feeling that you guys know which mc im talking about. The one about bath houses. That pissed me off. How was that at all relevant?
Anyone use POV on that immigrant mother? I said that since she had immigrant Children, her take on the situation and severity of it could he considered valid and truthful because she experienced the hostility first hand
@Falconsroach7 Pretty sure I said that. If not, I thought about it but decided I already had enough. What was your talk on the guy from the dictionary who criticized the laws, and what was your take on the magazine cover?
@Waldoizhere I know what you’re talking about, but our teacher likes to make jokes and he would constantly make jokes about that topic so I knew the answer.
@CGlynn I avoided the magazine at all costs because I didn’t wanna misinterpret it. I said the guy from the dictionary forum or whatever was important because his statement most likely reflected the values of the French people and it would adversely affect the French language. Basically, I used it to show a change in conception from the guy who wanted to impose strict language laws. It might have been more analysis than pov, now that I think about it
@Falconsroach7 I’m talking about the guy who was against the Toubon Laws. I interpreted as that some change was good, but the language needed to be preserved.
@CGlynn I thought he said preservation was useless and making good films and books would help development. If i was wrong that would proba be my major misinterpretation
@CGlynn was the answer the mineral healing thing?
@Waldoizhere No I’m pretty sure the answer was the soldiers. The mineral healing is right, lots of people believed in that.
@Waldoizhere Yea as I’ve said I agree with that. He said that you should preserve but not by law because the language should be allowed to develop and change on its own. To me that is enough to put it into the change paragraph. If not that’ll be my major misinterpretation, but I think it will be fine.
@CGlynn that’s who I was talking about too haha. I might have had a misinterpretation there then I said that he was open to the language continuing to develop and change, but that it was pointless to try and keep it the same and enforce it that way. Is that not how you interpreted it?
And I think I played it safe enough with the magazine by simply saying that some obviously held that viewpoint in France that they can’t say I misinterpreted it.