***Official January 2015 SAT (US ONLY) THREAD***

what did u guys get for the one in the swimming passage, when it asks you the feeling of the guy who requested a painting? i was deciding between disappointed and exasperated

@DeshiBasara2222‌ OMG I’m so stupid. Ugh I completely glossed over the question and did not read the entire thing so I had median and mode as the same. Guess that’s -1 for Math in me

@jamanda‌ you can’t use had not yet proved, it has to be had not yet proven, the had makes it that way. had not yet proven was not a choice so I left it as A.

@prospect123 the answer would be exasperated

Don’t remember which answer choice, sorry…when two things in a sentence (separate clauses) occur in the past, “had” can only be used for the first action

@TheDesiBoy‌ thats what I had.

@prospect123‌ It was exasperated. Or I could be wrong 8-|
@TheDesiBoy‌ No worries, mate. That’s still 770.

@DeshiBasara2222‌ how do you know that would be a 770?

what did you guys put for the very last question of the short writing section #14

also #10 on long section… something in part by (us having)

wouldnt the mayans question have an error? instead of using it shouldnt it be who use it

x>y, they’re both negative but y has double the size, making it more negative, i got y/x, 1/pi

So the Mars passage was experimental right? I really messed up the question about how nanowires. I said something something, predominate?

Also, for those of you wondering about scores, Google “the college panda SAT score calculator” - it gives you a pretty good estimate.

and “will they” was underlined… is that wrong?

@Mango920452‌ It’s a classic math curve.

@DeshiBasara2222‌ Mars was not experimental, I had it and only had 3 reading sections, plus it was the 19 questions/20 min one, which is usually never experimental.

was the authentic music one experimental?

Wait nevermind, I’m thinking about the nanowires one. With Salt. Not mars. My bad.

@jamanda‌ I said that was wrong cause it just didn’t sound right XD

@ABCGIRL‌ i dont think so. I had only 3 reading sections, and that was one of them.

@ABCGIRL unfortunately not. My experimental was a math section, but I still had the authentic wires reading section