<p>for me
CR: easier than usual
Math: average/slightly easier than usual
W: average. slightly iffy on some questions</p>
<p>@jlee, It seems like the sentence was something like “X was so ---- that she refused to deviate from complete adherence to details”… not sure</p>
<p>If you had 2 maths back to back like I did (3 + 4), 4 was experimental.</p>
<p>mode and median was the same</p>
<p>on my test i had 2 math grid in sections both with 18 questions.</p>
<p>Punctilious:showing great attention to detail or correct behavior.</p>
<p>How is that wrong? The subject was judging everyone because they didn’t do small things the way they were supposed to be done. She wasn’t stolid, she was freaking out.</p>
<p>was belligerent the answer to anything</p>
<p>@satman1111 It wasn’t mundane. You could have interpreted the narrator’s comment regarding its appeal to her as a romantic novel as sarcasm but she hadn’t made any such comments prior to that debatable one. I ultimately chose romantic to dramatic after narrowing it down between those two.</p>
<p>Tristesse, I put evoke… Epitomize</p>
<p>Why is punctilious wrong?</p>
<p>was it neutral for the passage about music?</p>
<p>Juniorhigh, I didn’t answer belligerent, I think i put indignant.</p>
<p>@Lucky139 no…the sentence implied that she was firm in her beliefs.</p>
<p>Anyone get m=r?</p>
<p>Was section 4 the one with the fill ins?</p>
<p>did anyone put exonerate/implicate for SC?</p>
<p>is it me or did you guys also got a bunch of Cs for the writing question
i was paranoid</p>
<p>She was firm in her adherence to correct behavior. Thus, punctilious.
stol·id:calm, dependable, and showing little emotion or animation. </p>
<p>She kept calling out everyone. She was far from not showing any emotion.</p>
<p>@JD1327 that’s right man. Makes sense too. Take a sample set: 15 numbers where the m=r originally you could say 20 and fourteen 10s. Quadruple that and m still equals r.</p>
<p>i put exonerate, wasn’t sure though</p>