<p>did different forms have different experimentals? i had a math experimental with a set A multiply by 4 range mode stuff and a quadratic (r,s)</p>
<p>what were the essay prompts?</p>
<p>So what it was was that the segment from the larger circle to the outer edge of the smaller one was 5. Then you had a segment from center, O, of the smaller circle to the outer circle. 6 was the diameter of the smaller circle and obviously from O to the point at which the segment met the one length 5 you have radius 8. 64/9 is right. *<strong><em>ing *</em></strong> isn’t drawn to scale, tits.</p>
<p>PlayerZero i put unshakable. i think its right</p>
<p>PlayerZero, I’m 99% sure it was punctilious. That’s what I put</p>
<p>@PlayerZero</p>
<p>I put punctilious as well.</p>
<p>As for the forbearance question, I just guessed.</p>
<p>Set a multiplied by 4; ratio of median to mean was NOT experimental</p>
<p>Why was the CR section easy compared to the math in this SAT?</p>
<p>What was the median and range one? I put m=r…</p>
<p>@xCossack unshakable means “strongly felt and unable to be changed”
so im pretty sure it was unshakable</p>
<p>Damn, read the circle one wrong and put area of the outside part… There goes my 800…</p>
<p>what did that punctilious question say? i dont recall it saying “showing great attention to detail”, but i may be wrong</p>
<p>What was answer for the question that had answer chociees of :</p>
<p>provoke…details
evoke…epitomize
inaugurates…belie</p>
<p>for CR with Mrs.Flowers was it mundane?</p>
<p>I put mundane, because in the first or second paragraphs, it said that she reads a lot.</p>
<p>@PlayerZero I don’t think the one about the man waking up was disquiet to forbearance or apprehension to defiance. I don’t exactly remember what I put but I don’t believe it was either of those…could be wrong. Passage seemed almost too easy thus making it easy to overlook simple details or not draw proper conclusions from inferences.</p>
<p>Punctilious and unshakable were both wrong. Punctilious for sure. I narrowed it down between unshakable and something else but unshakable was too informal. You’re looking more for a word like stolid. Punctilious was definitely wrong though. No doubt</p>
<p>I put evoke, epitomizes, and mundane for flowers one</p>
<p>@Red i put m=r as well</p>
<p>Oh yeah there was a math question that said the mode and median were equal in a set of 15 positive. Now if you took all the numbers multiplied them by 4 what would the relationship between the new mode and median be???</p>
<p>Does anyone remember ( the mode and median were represented by variables, I said the new mode and median would be the same, what did you)</p>
<p>@Aethersky that wasn’t experimental…I had 3 math sections on my test and that was one of them.</p>