Official US November SAT discussion

<p>"For the one with the Japanese calligraphy guy…
I put impertinent. I don’t how the question the woman asked was “improptu” (which means to improvise). If anything, it was irrelevant (impertinent) because the young sensei wasn’t being asked questions that he felt were relevant. He says this at the end of the story. "</p>

<p>Impertinent would be correct, imo, for the questions listed off BEFORE the question about his name. The story basically says she ran down her list of questions and then after she was done asked him his age, which is impromptu.</p>

<p>does anyone remember about what the author’s view was on the impetus theory?</p>

<p>yup~ i got merely.</p>

<p>So decision on that question is impromptu?</p>

<p>@ PotatoMan</p>

<p>I think it was wrong but inherently plausible</p>

<p>@ PotatoMan: Wrong but inherently plausible.</p>

<p>all right. good.</p>

<p>For those of you with the grammar experimental, it was section 4/5 (I forgot haha), right?</p>

<p>What was the answer to the one about truism?</p>

<p>Commonplace, I think.</p>

<p>Anyone answer please :frowning: did you have to write the quote on the back? Sorry it’s a stupid/rhetorical question, but I’m concerned…</p>

<p>Can anyone confirm commonplace… i narrowed it down to 2 answers but i picked the one below commonplace</p>

<p>@ angelsface200 Ohyeah. Um, my testing center was required to. I’m going to assume that your testing center isn’t the only one that did that. If I were you, I would not be too worried about it. Collegeboard can’t invalidate your score or anything like that.</p>

<p>Why would it be wrong but inherently plausible? What were the other choices?</p>

<p>I don’t think it is that big of a deal. I thought it was weird because the proctor had us do it after section 3 of the test.</p>

<p>I put commonplace because that’s the only one that made sense to me. The one below that answer was subtle, and I just didn’t remember reading anything about subtlety in the passage. To be honest, I didn’t even really know what the question was asking :stuck_out_tongue: But I put commonplace heh.</p>

<p>I confirm commonplace</p>

<p>Oh okay, thanks :stuck_out_tongue: Our whole class kept questioning the proctor about it.</p>

<p>WAS THIS MATH SECTION EXPERIMENTAL:</p>

<p>It had the question</p>

<p>Which of the following numbers for n disproves this notion. </p>

<p>2(n)^2 + 1 = prime number</p>

<p>Choices for n were</p>

<p>a) 1
b) 3
c) 5
d) 6
e) 9</p>

<p>51 is not prime? lol *** …</p>

<p>No that was not experimental.</p>