<p>:(</p>
<p>All I wanted was a 2400…</p>
<p>Carbon/ it is quite possible that you’ll get an 800 with 2 wrong and a 12 essay. (ex. This past Oct.) you’ll probably get an 800 because the writing section was on the difficult side this time.</p>
<p>@JefferyJung, last October there was a 2 question MC curve on Grammar? </p>
<p>WHOA.</p>
<p>That makes me very happy.</p>
<p>2 wrong with a 12 essay.</p>
<p>does anyone remember the answer to the question “press the light on the hands” ?
it’s on the article “computizing skin”</p>
<p>Eh it was C I think. Explains a phenomenon maybe was the answer</p>
<p>OMG I just remembered a tough grammar question I had problem on. Note: I had a grammar experimental so I don’t remember if this was on the experimental but i don’t think it was.</p>
<p>It was identifying sentence errors. The sentence read:</p>
<p>After (so and so) [argued] in the Supreme Court 70 years ago, a park was established blah blah blah. No error.</p>
<p>I’m not sure if it was argued or had argued, but I put no error because I felt like had argued would have been overthinking the problem, and overthinking is usually my problem in identifying sentence errors. YOUR THOUGHTS PLEASE, CC PEOPLE.</p>
<p>@praying shouldn’t it be sth like inspiration?</p>
<p>for the invention articles
“how will author of passage 1 view the woman in passage 2?”</p>
<p>The woman in passage 2 had the same motives or whatever as those mentioned in passage 1.</p>
<p>@ChrxswxN: I remember what you are talking about but don’t really remember what I marked down. i think i put no error.</p>
<p>@ChrsxswxN, it was ‘No Error.’</p>
<p>I don’t remember this computizing skin question/passage…</p>
<p>@simon did you by any chance have the CR experimental? Because I did and so far I believe the computizing skin passage is from an experimental section</p>
<p>nope i had writing experimental</p>
<p>I am signing up for december’s date. Time to pull a 2400.</p>
<p>YESSSS Thank you carbon omg that was one of the only ones I had doubt about :'D And the computizing skin question/passage was a short one (I think) about how scientists have been able to effectively create the image of skin. The image of skin changed from being superficial to real, and the passage emphasized this change. I had the writing experimental and I remember the skin passage. Or maybe there were different reading sections? Idk CB is being stupid for this test.</p>
<p>And can I have anyone to back carbon up for the grammar?</p>
<p>@chrxs i don’t think so
the woman in passage 2 is trying to build some basic stuff to help people in rural areas. what she’s doing has been done by people already so i think it sth like" what interests her is not concerned by others"</p>
<p>btw do u guys remember something like “inspiration of a technique” and “see a phenomenon” something like that in the article “computizing the skin?”</p>
<p>simonl, these passages were incredibly tricky. At first I thought the second passage refuted the first. However, upon careful analysis, I came to the conclusion that it supported the first. Why? It said that she improved upon pre-existing methods of harvesting grain. Furthermore, her methods underscore the “frustration” of those experienced in the first passage, as evidenced when the author of the second says “You will never know blah blah blah until you’ve spent 3 and a half hours blah blah blah to only get half a cup of grain”. This is my thinking. </p>
<p>Backup or refutation plx.</p>
<p>@simon for that passage i remember one of the answers was breakthrough and maybe demonstrate a phenomenon or something like that</p>