Official US November SAT discussion

<p>

</p>

<p>I don’t know if you should trust me… The Nov SAT was very iffy for me. I chose “undermine” choice as well, but this question was one of the questions that I starred… so idk.</p>

<p>Oh yeah, I see how its sonorous. How was the impromptu question worded?</p>

<p>what was the answer to the SC question: atavism and fanaticism.</p>

<p>didn’t have that one @sheepGetKilled</p>

<p>Was this the passage about inventions? The first paragraph about plasma TV’s and the second about a woman helping poor people? If so, I didn’t put undermine, I thought the passages complimented each other, but the second was about inventions appealing to less fortunate people… I could be incorrect.</p>

<p>Jeffery, how many SAT’s have you taken?</p>

<p>Edit: And what was the answer to the question with the octagon and you need to find the x value? I was confused even though it was only an intermediate question.</p>

<p>Borunks: It was asking what is x^2+2xy+y^2, not x^2+y^2</p>

<p>you just square both sides and get 15 right?</p>

<p>x + y = sqrt(15)</p>

<p>(x + y)^2 = sqrt(15)^2</p>

<p>x^2 + 2xy + y^2 = 15</p>

<p>15 ⇒ B</p>

<p>@JTown, I thought that too. I put how the first passage’s theme was exemplified by the woman in Passage 2.</p>

<p>@Sheep</p>

<p>The answer was pluralism I believe. It’s because they stuck in that one area for a long time.</p>

<p>X value was 8 for the hexagon.</p>

<p>wow, im so dumb… I completely forgot that… Sorry guys, and thanks!</p>

<p>so mad i got an easy problem like that wrong lol…</p>

<p>Missed grid-ins count as a skip (-0) right? Also, I said the reporter’s question was probing.</p>

<p>I don’t think it is pluralism. Pluralism is a philosophical term that has to do with 2 realities…</p>

<p>The artists and poet book question was 160 right?</p>

<p>100√5 was an answer to #6 on student produce response MC I think?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Do you remember a little more about the answer choice? If the answer choice said “complimented”, I don’t think that was correct. I think passage 1 was about why technologies inovate, but passage 2 suggested Smith’s experience to suggest otherwise.</p>

<p>hahaha 2350…</p>