<p>This is typical from people who aren’t musicians, don’t go to Penn for music, and lack perspective to see the program for what it is. (Also, Curtis is great, but it is not the “top conservatory” of America. A different debate; I digress.) I don’t mean to have such a harsh tone, but I’ve worked extremely hard to get where I am as a cellist and musician and find it irritating when everyone and their mothers feel the need to pipe in with their meaningless two-cents. I speak from very real experience and a balanced, fair perspective having spent two years at a music school before coming to Penn. Anyone who is merely speculating from outside the department or typing hearsay only serves to confuse applicants. Let me settle this now:</p>
<p>You can take classes (e.g., orchestration, instrumental conducting for non-conducting majors) at Curtis if the class is not offered at Penn and if you’re approved by the Penn Music Dept. as well as the Curtis registrar. As far as studying with Curtis instrumental professors goes, I have never known it to be possible. I know of maybe two students at Penn who would be even marginally competent in such studios (and none who have the time to devote), so it’s not really an issue.</p>
<p>In regard to Penn’s ranking as a graduate music program, not only is it more than a decade out of date, but also most of the composition faculty who put Penn’s music department on the map in the first place (e.g., George Crumb, George Rochberg) are either dead or do not teach there at all. Such rankings are just nonsense, more so because we’re dealing with the apprenticeship of an art form, not an academic subject. (Theory and composition are not, by any stretch of the imagination and contrary to popular belief, purely academic subjects. Penn treats them as such, which is why the courses generally mislead students and fail ultimately to create any real foundation of basic musicianship/diatonic theory in anyone who has come up through the curriculum. My Theory IV class was just, forgive me, ■■■■■■■■. They were and are the epitome of Penn musicians: charlatans with almost no consummate knowledge or command of Western music, but possessing very typical Ivy League arrogance.)</p>
<p>That said, if you’re looking to do ethnomusicology, musicology, or music history, come to Penn for music by all means.</p>
<p>JHS: Who’s your kid’s friend? I probably know him. Some friends of mine too are enthusiastic about Penn’s music program, but only because they know of nothing else and frankly don’t have the command of either their instrument or Western music in general to expect anything more. I’d be happy to entertain a debate with someone else in the program on the forum, but secondhand testimonials aren’t helpful.</p>