<p>So I decided to take the ACT and figured I would do it blindly and not study so I could just get an objective view of what the test was and what it tests. After being severely surprised that there was a science section I figured my score would not be that great and I was okay with that because I thought I was going to be using the SAT as my main test. I got my composite score back and it was a 31 which I'm happy with for not studying but I'm conflicted: do I retake the test or do I leave it as kind of a "one hit wonder?" I know colleges enjoy seeing a kid be satisfied with his first score because it breaks up the monotony of every kid taking the test two or three times but if my score were to improve the next time around would it be to my advantage to take it again? Would having just one score, a 31, look better than two scores that are say a 31 and a 34 (albeit that is being very generous)? I would study for the next one but I wasn't sure if the confidence that a single score emits would be more attractive than a less confident but higher two scores.</p>
<p>Depends, where are you applying?</p>
<p>A single score is not more advantageous than multiple scores. </p>
<p>Colleges understand that you’re under pressure when you take exams so they allow you to retake the exams. It’s better for you to take it 2-3 times so you know that you did your best. </p>
<p>DL I am planning on applying to Berkeley, Occidental, UCLA, and Harvey Mudd.</p>
<p>you stand almost no chance with that score at harvery mudd. however, it is very borderline at the other schools you listed. to be on the safe side, try to get your score at least to 32. preferably 33. for harvery mudd though, try to aim for 34 or higher. </p>