<p>Yup. According to Stephen Hawking, Newton could have a mental breakdown at the slightest criticism of his work. </p>
<p>I want to see an intellectual (and hopefully civil) discussion about Einstein’s revisions to Newton’s fundamental understanding of the universe. Having two giants of physics in conversation with each other…what more to ask for? (Well maybe this Feynman legacy: <a href=“Undergraduate”>Undergraduate)</p>
<p>And then maybe they could explain how magnets work to the clown people. </p>
<p>Back on topic: What purpose do you think these “facebook” questions served the the admissions committee. I kept second-guessing my choices (which I cannot presently recall).</p>
<p>I think what they want is a little more context about what sort of stuff excites you as a person, independent of you as a student. They probably have a pretty good idea of when someone’s just name-dropping works they think will be impressive. </p>
<p>I have no idea what my favorites say about me; to be honest, I universally loathe having to pick favorites. It’s so depressingly one-dimensional; I just don’t see the point of limiting the number of things in the world I can consider the most awesome. I would rather have an unlimited number of such things in my world.</p>
<p>Edited to add: You know what I really wonder? I listed twitter in one of those favorites fields. I wonder if they’re going to actually look me up. If they see I tweeted about registering for UC Davis orientation, I hope they understand I’m just trying to prepare for disappointment!</p>
<p>haha, it’s cool I put facebook down. I understand what you mean about how it’s a little “one-dimensional.” I wouldn’t call the things I listed as “favorites” as much as, “Things I tend to observe more than others.”</p>
<p>haah rejections from yale, columbia, penn, all in last 2 days… and in 2 min stanford… i feel like 2 cents after working so freakin long on those apps…</p>