<p>Dear fellow parents of college and high school students, do anyone has an experience or opinions about the importance of the maximum science workload at hs for the admissions to the top colleges? </p>
<p>My D (now junior) is strong in all academic areas (including math and sciences) but considers herself more of a "humanities person" with the especially strong interests in music and languages/linguistics. So far, she has had 4 APs (Music Theory, US History, BC Calculus, French) and numerous honors classes, including Chemistry and Physisc Honors. Her senior year she plans to take 3 APs (Statisics, Gov., English) and, being true to her main passion, a bunch of music electives. She also considers to take some community college classes in one more language and/or psychology as it would have much more relevancy to her interests than any of the lab sciences offered at school. </p>
<p>But she wants to have a shot at the very selective colleges, which have on their web-sites the "high school prep" section: it usually says something like "lab sciences 3 or 4 years", or "3 years of science (4 recommended)" etc. </p>
<p>She actually considers taking AP Chemistry (so far, chem had been the only lab science she really liked) at her school, but had heard it's among the hardest APs and her school is not known to have really good chem teachers for AP level. DD also wants to have more time than she does this year for her music activities and to sleep, excersize, do the college applications ... and generally, have some life. </p>
<p>Would, in your opinions (or, saying by your kids' experiences) not having AP science in her courseload detrimental to her chances at the very selective places? Or, would taking cc classes in humanities be appreciated by adcoms equally to taking AP class in science?</p>