<p>"Back to the topic, 'African American' is nothing more than the politically correct term for Black people. It should not be taken literally."</p>
<p>A VERY good point. Are we beginning to realize here how silly all this politically correct crap is? That is why South Park is such a great show. /totally off topic</p>
<p>Now, back to fun argument w/ historic:</p>
<p>"the % of them must be extremely low (we ARE talking about top 25 colleges) b/c of the fact that many of their pops. in college are less than 10%."
Wait. So now it's OK that the system is abused because, according to one person who cites no facts, it isn't abused much? And do you know what? Only ONE top USNews 25 school, Caltech, has less than 10% URMs (Native Americans, Hispanics, and African Americans). And even they had 9%. ONE, not many, not most, heck, not even 2. There goes your credibility.</p>
<p>"CC kids will have you believe that there is rampat abuse of AA by URMS but you must consider who THOSE KIDS ARE! The majority are well off white kids who attend expense and competitive schools, so when they see the few URMS attending their school they note how some/most have lower sats then they do and thus assume that all URMS, w/ less competive stats then them, apply and are accepted into top 25's."</p>
<p>First of all it's not the URMs abusing anything. They are just, by no choice of their own, given a benefit which they do not deserve. That's right, they don't deserve it. Some, perhaps many, would recieve similar treatment under a fair, economic AA system, but some would not. So the question is not how many who don't deserve are getting favors, it is why don't we just have economic AA.
The second part of your quote seems to be saying that a white person isn't qualified to say anything critical of AA. You claim that most people on CC are white and prep schooled. This is most likely false, though we don't really have a way to say for sure. I would say that there is a disproportionatly high amount of Asians on CC, and a disproportionatly high amount of prep school kids. This is because those particular groups, on average, place more emphasis on recieving a good education (usually defined by them as a top school). Notice I said 'on average'. I don't think you can find a quote on this board where anyone suggested that EVERY URM got in because of AA. I bet many hard-earned dollars that a CCer has never told you that ALL URMs got into a top 25 school, or any combination of those two thoughts. That is crazy talk. What we can say, based on scientific studies and surveys, proven over and over, is that the average SAT scores and other stats of URMs at schools practicing AA is lower than that of Asians and whites. Therefore, the statement that it is easier for a black person to get into, say, Harvard, is essentially true. You can dance around it a little, but the facts remain. This is, of course, the essence of affirmative action.</p>
<p>"But I have a news flash for you: I can only count ONE URM who applied and got accepted to a top school (ND, she was half hispanic, and well off and well just put hispanic and well she was 19/300 so this is kinda a bad example which is kinda mak'in me even more sadder that i don't even know a 100% URM who even applied:/) ANYWAYS my point is, many middle class (and i mean MIDDLE CLASS, NOT CC MIDDLE CLASS) URMS don't even apply even if they can get that AA boost, just cost to mcuh and why bother? whats wrong with a state college? its not like they have family friends who work in admission office or have legacies"</p>
<p>This first part is so childish I feel stupid responding. Just because you, personally, don't know any URMs that applied to top schools doesn't mean anything. It CERTAINLY doesn't mean that few URMs apply to top colleges. (But then again, what you are saying is that the one URM you know who got into a top college cheated the system, because they might not even technically qualify as being a URM) In fact, one might say that more URMs would apply, partly because they are aggressively solicited by top colleges, and partly because they know they have an advantage over white applicants. But I suspect you are right that the URMs do not place much importance on getting into top colleges. But here's a NEWSFLASH for you: neither does anyone else except for a segment of Asians and the elite prep school group. (BTW, I happen to be a true middle class white kid who goes to a academically crappy rural public school , only 6 APs, and about 45-50% what you would call URMs). And perhaps 3 or 4 kids in a class of 300 last year even applied to a top 30 school, and didn't expect to get in. Also a note on your last sentence: you are sorely mistaken if you think that any significant portion of the acceptees has legacy parents, let alone adcom connections. </p>
<p>"POINT: Don't worry your little head to much as of now about a URM taking you spot, don't let CC users scare you! We're still struggle. But pretty good points I do must say, don't take offense when white people oppose AA race just when they go around and OPPOSE ECONOMIC. "</p>
<p>Yeah historic, don't let those pesky facts about AA get in your prejudiced head! CCers just want to be racial oppressors! Wow. While the middle part is, well, incomprehensible, I must say, FIND ME A WHITE PERSON ON CC WHO OPPOSES ECONOMIC AA. it may redeem what little face you have left!</p>