What I'd like to say...

<p>If ever I had a tough letter to write, this is it. My challenge is to convince you that when Harvard University is challenged, it either denies everything or claims that its words were taken out of context and that its opponents are plotting against it. Let me get to the crux of the matter: If it thinks its intimations represent progress, Harvard University should rethink its definition of progress. Given Harvard University's current mind-set, when people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And Harvard University is to blame.</p>

<p>It's one thing to treat anyone who doesn't agree with Harvard University to a torrent of vitriol and vilification, but wanting to step on other people's toes is going too far. Does Harvard University have trouble living with itself, knowing that it likes the sound of its own voice? I once asked Harvard University that question; I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that if it weren't for Harvard University's double standards it would have no standards at all. Hence, it's utterly a waste of time even to address Harvard University's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that it has so frequently lied about how unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point that some weaker-minded people are starting to believe it. We need to explain to such people that many people are shocked when I tell them that iracund junkies gobble up Harvard University's inhumane rejoinders like golden morsels of adversarialism. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that Harvard University ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, it tends to utter so much verbiage about colonialism that I can conclude only that it would be great if we could rage, rage against the dying of the light. Still, if we take a step, just a step, towards addressing the issue of jingoism, then maybe we can open people's eyes (including our own) to a vision of how to present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future.</p>

<p>After hearing about Harvard University's abysmal attempts to break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness, I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. There's something I've observed about Harvard University. Namely, it may not know how to spell "physicophilosophical", but it indubitably knows how to eliminate the plebiscitary mechanisms that ensure a free and democratic society. I've further observed that my current plan is to keep the faith. Yes, it will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but even maverick Internet news and opinion sites are beginning to proclaim that it is just making a mug of itself when it says that lying is morally justifiable as long as it's referred to as "strategic deception". In fact, I have said that to Harvard University on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until it stops wooing over evil extortionists by using tactics such as scapegoating, reductionist and simplistic solutions, demagoguery, and a conspiracy theory of history. All of this once again proves the old saying that Harvard University favors obfuscation and deviousness above frankness.</p>

<p>I wish my angst was this eloquent.</p>

<p>That was hardly eloquent…I have no idea what it meant.</p>

<p>I don’t even see a concrete complaint. You don’t like their attitude? Okay. So? </p>

<p>“You see, I had thought everybody already knew that Harvard University ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do” Please take your own advice. Writing clearly is an important skill. Your entire passage was extremely wordy.</p>

<p>^2nded. [Fry</a> Can’t Tell Meme Generator - DIY LOL](<a href=“Meme Generator -”>Meme Generator -)</p>

<p>What are you even trying to say…?</p>

<p>You write like a mentally ill person with a thesaurus</p>

<p>I keep reading random sentences and loling.</p>

<p>^@alwaysleah <a href=“my%20form%20of%20liking%20a%20post%20on%20a%20forum%20ahahha”>like</a></p>

<p>to be fair. All I’ve been doing the last half hour is cussing at random objects.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Nice quote from Dylan Thomas :p</p>

<p>■■■■■</p>

<p>I don’t understand the OP’s point. But frankly, this year’s admission rates are making me really scared for next year.</p>

<p>Exercise in SAT vocabulary…?</p>

<p>Your head is either in a thesaurus or the clouds. Honestly, this is what you spend your time worrying about? Even if you feel this was necessary…where was common sense when you decided to post this on one of the most judgmental sites on the Internet?</p>

<p>To all (except the OP): It’s a joke. And a damned funny one at that.</p>

<p>lemme guess, his email started, “I am sorry to inform you…”</p>

<p>[Scott</a> Pakin’s automatic complaint-letter generator](<a href=“http://www.pakin.org/complaint/]Scott”>Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator)</p>

<p>Oh please.</p>

<p>I’ve known about the Complaint Generator since I was 13</p>

<p>Nice try by the OP to fool everyone though</p>

<p>…What did I just read?</p>

<p>Right-click, synonyms, right-click, synonyms…</p>

<p>I’ll get right to the point. Mr. Brainshot3 offers nothing but cheap insults and banal rhetoric. Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on Brainshot3’s annunciations. I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions. Nevertheless, Brainshot3 has an uncanny knack for making evil appear good and good appear evil—and Brainshot3 knows it. I, for one, have long been under the impression that if he truly believes that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. Brainshot3 never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. He presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, he seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that he can’t attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. Brainshot3 could jump on everything that is written, said, or even implied and label it as either hectoring or sappy.</p>

<p>Several things Brainshot3 has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how he is the arbiter of all things. More fundamentally, if he wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn’t just throw out the word “hydrometallurgically”, for example, and expect us to be scared. What a cunning coup on the part of Brainshot3’s loyalists, who set out to scrawl pro-McCarthyism graffiti over everything and got as far as they did without anyone raising an eyebrow. Brainshot3 hurts people wherever they may be, penthouse or poorhouse, yet Brainshot3’s press releases, though creative, are a yawning abyss of poststructuralism. This sort of vertiginous paradox is well known to most covinous chuckleheads. Not only have ostentatious, illiterate crackpots decided to glorify their ruminations by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their artifices are being debated as though they were actually reasonable.</p>

<p>Brainshot3 has yet to acknowledge the preternatural wickedness of the blood flowing through his veins. This means, in particular, that one can usually be pretty sure when Brainshot3 is lying. Sometimes there’s a little doubt: maybe it’s not a deliberate lie but merely a difference of opinion. But when Brainshot3 claims that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality—there’s no room for ambiguity: he’s undeniably lying. It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, “his pals lie about their utterances, and then, when we’re all convinced that no harm will be done, they damn this nation and this world to Hell.” His publications symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion—extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Other than that, if you want to hide something from Brainshot3, you just have to put it in a book. He insists that lazy rakes are easily housebroken. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.</p>

<p>I may be questioning the regnant conventional wisdom by stating this but maybe my current plan is to free people from the fetters of wowserism’s poisonous embrace. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but he fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, Brainshot3 conveniently forgets his religion’s messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to break down the industrial-technological system. His beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are becoming increasingly villainous. They have already begun to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Brainshot3 Rainbow of Solipsism. Now fast-forward a few years to a time in which they have enabled Brainshot3 to extinguish the voices of opposition. If you don’t want such a time to come then help me put an end to Brainshot3’s evildoing. Help me condemn—without hesitation, without remorse—all those who do exactly the things Brainshot3 accuses adversarial scandalmongers of doing.</p>

<p>Pardon my saying so, but Brainshot3 has been trying to popularize the narrative that his teachings are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. My fear is that if he’s successful at promoting such cockamamy notions then even the man on the Clapham omnibus may agree to let him doctor evidence and classification systems and make mumpish generalizations to support horny, preconceived views. I’ll try not to dwell on this, but he tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. Brainshot3’s oleaginous vaporings often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of commercialism and alcoholism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain. It is immature and stupid of Brainshot3 to sensationalize all of the issues. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to establish beyond a shred of doubt that an understanding of jujuism is propaedeutic to an understanding of his renitent deeds, and that’s why I say that his belief is that he should be free to devastate vast acres of precious farmland. Hey, Brainshot3! Satan just called; he wants his worldview back.</p>

<p>As sure as you’re born, Brainshot3’s execrations prove that he did little to no research before concluding that he’s morally obligated to tell everyone else what to do. Now that’s a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I’ve presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that Brainshot3 either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. He even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to pit people against each other. I unquestionably hope that humanity will rid this earth of petulant quacks with the greatest dispatch, since otherwise, the earth might well become rid of humanity. Sententious ragamuffins who taunt, deride, and generally vilipend Brainshot3’s enemies might not recognize the incongruities in Brainshot3’s stratagems, but an increasing number of people abhor Brainshot3’s obstinate, phlegmatic blandishments and are looking for alternatives, like the truth. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical over which Brainshot3 has any control. But that’s inconsequential because we must deliver new information about Brainshot3’s scary calumnies. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that any rational argument must acknowledge this. Brainshot3’s louche opinions, naturally, do not.</p>

<p>Brainshot3 is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it’s loopy to bring him to justice; that’s boring; that’s not cool. You know what I think of that, don’t you? I think that if Brainshot3 honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.</p>

<p>Brainshot3 says that “metanarratives” are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. Although I can’t say how well I’d do against him in a nationally televised steel-cage death match, I can say that hateful leeches have increasingly been drawing unsuspecting nitwits into the orbit of the worst kinds of lackluster rantipoles there are. Brainshot3 has a lot to answer for in regard to that. Is this anything other than salacious classism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that I would unequivocally like to comment on his attempt to associate resistentialism with revisionism. There is no association. I seethe with anger whenever I think about Brainshot3’s filthy, stentorian plans for the future. We can therefore extrapolate that last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince Brainshot3 that the same pattern of guilt-by-association practiced by his legates can be found in his shell games. As I expected, Brainshot3 was unconvinced.</p>

<p>Brainshot3 avers that he is clean and bright and pure inside. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and Brainshot3 are like oil and water. His despicable bunco games are meticulously designed to keep the population unaware, uneducated, dumbed down, and focused on stupefying activities like video games. The intention is to prevent people from noticing that Brainshot3 has been nurturing the seeds of our eventual destruction so that they grow like a rapidly malignant mutant form of kudzu. While some information provided by his followers may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or pretentious practices. If he ever does censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype, he will instantly have as his implacable and passionate enemies millions of people who want to encourage our spirits to soar. Such people know that a person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her actions. Brainshot3 has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he’ll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise.</p>

<p>I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, “Brainshot3’s yes-men will carry the product of his work into the future, even after Brainshot3 himself is long gone.” I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I’m not the only one who thinks that we need to stand up for our rights. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that free speech is wonderful as long as you’re not bashing Brainshot3 and the spiteful ergophobics in his Praetorian Guard, then there is definitely no hope for you. To recapitulate, if the word “interdestructiveness” occurs to the reader, he or she may recall that Mr. Brainshot3 once tried to lower this country’s moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity.</p>