<p>Any idea with the passage where the scholar described the Buddhist monk coming into China. I know he thought it could disrupt traditional order.</p>
<p>How about its parallel? Christian martyr in Rome or Aztec Priest in Spain?</p>
<p>I specifically remember it mentioning the defeat at Aksa... Aksa is a mosque in Jersalem. The triumph of the Christians at Granada was just that... in Granada-- Nowhere near Jerusalem.</p>
<p>I agree with the Enlightenment & politics with Latin America.</p>
<p>@ JCD... I am 100% positive about my answers on this one, because it's straight out of my Barron's review.</p>
<p>He was trying to convince the Han emperor not to make Buddhism the official state religion, and his situation was exactly analogous to a Roman priest of Jupiter during the reign of Constantine (since Constantine made Christianity legal in Rome).</p>
<p>Any idea on which problem Africa did not have after World War 2? Industry destroyed by WW2 seemed likely, since Africa never had major industry...</p>
<p>@hookem hah, some get really specific like that...Livingstone was just one of those missionaries that ran round in Africa trying to be good. And yeah I agree with the first part of the Han/Buddhist one, but second part...best guess is yours!</p>
<p>3rd crusade was epic fail by crusaders - saladin anyone? If that passage mentioned aksa...that was the mosque/church in Jerusalem.</p>
<p>Scales change each year, hopefully it will remain the lenient curve SAT World is known for...unlike Korean!</p>
<p>I forget what the question was asking, as said a little earlier...it's either mexico or peru depending on what geographical region they mentioned.</p>
<p>Any idea on the difference between North American colonies and the Spanish/Portuguese South American ones?</p>
<p>They said South America I believe, which would lead me to think Peru, since Mexico is sort of a "tweener."</p>
<p>for that one, I remember contemplating that "they were easier on the natives" or w/e, but I ended up going with "they had a more unified colonial bureaucracy" or w/e, because the British colonies were so disjointed.....idk</p>
<p>^^same on the bureaucracy. disjointed colonies vs. spanish economic systems, later viceroys and major government role. </p>
<p>South America is probably peru then, new spain would be mexico. Latin america is just ambiguous...includes both...but new spain (mexico) came first.</p>
<p>You should have a 700...One again, it does vary each year. A lot of people here on CC said it was hard, and generally that's been a somewhat good predictor.</p>
<p>One year 58/95 was a 700. Another year was 61/96. So +/- 3.</p>