Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, to the OP.
For a few years running, I suggested âCelebrating Our Common Humanity Day,â because posters in some of the CC forums were using the terms ârobots,â or âmachines,â or something similar, to refer to students who had outstanding objective qualifications (GPA, course rigor, standardized test scores, EC involvement), but whose applications were declined by their preferred schools. They are every bit as human as anyone else, and it is not right to distance them by regarding them as ârobotic.â
But of course, the issue of reactions on CC is much broader than the reactions to that group. As the OP suggested, it is important to bear in mind that many of the posts reflect the emotions of the moment, when a student has just discovered that he/she has been rejected. The great majority of these students will bounce back to normal in the matter of a few hours, or a day, or at most a few days. There is no need to trample on their immediate reaction of disappointment, even if they did not appear to have much chance at the âdreamâ school (or strike the reader as having arrogant assumptions).
Reaction posts that suggest "Well maybe you shouldnât have . . . " or "Well maybe you should have . . . " are really not welcome after the fact! The suggestions can be extremely helpful while there is still time to implement them. If the situation just kept repeating itself for a given individual, then after-the-fact comments might be useful. But hardly anyone applies to colleges for undergraduate work more than 2 or 3 times. If the strategy did not work the first time around, the students may take a gap year or go for the back-up plan (if there is one), and then reapply. But they know at that point that they need to do something different, and there is always the opportunity to provide advice in the next application season.
One of the comments that I used to really dislike was âItâs all about fit!â, a comment usually made exuberantly by a student who had been admitted in preference to other students with better objective qualifications (and no, I havenât read any of the essays!). They may be right. However, this comment for some reason always comes across to me as very close to âWe donât want your kind around here.â I am sure that is not actually the intended message (well, most of the time); and one needs to be as tolerant of in-your-face exuberance as of disappointment.