<p>I think I should step in to help SDG a bit about this argument.</p>
<p>HKUST IS indeed better than HKU in its EMBA program at the moment- and it is consistently ranked the top 5 in the past years. However, HKU has just also launched its EMBA program, where there will be rankings next year (since you have to wait for a year before it gets ranked). At this moment, it can be argued that UST does have better EMBA program. HOWEVER - it is wrong is generalise that the faculty teaching EMBA teaches undergraduate, because THAT IS NOT THE CASE. HKUST’s BBA has a TA system and some of the courses are not even taught by professors (just a portion). Also, the staff for EMBA (avg 7-10 years working exp) usually do research and more important things etc, hence another point to support the fact that they do not teach UG. Another point - for undergraduate courses, HKU’s business courses ARE more selective that HKUST, everyone knows that, published statistics on their website and on newspaper articles can substantiate this point. FYI, the business program I am attending in HKU - IBGM requires a 40 pts condition whereas the equivalent in UST only requires 36 pts - this remains true for majority of the other applicants. All your rankings are only for graduate school - not undergraduate.</p>
<p>Also for your SWEEPING generalisation Jason
“what you do is find a ranking for that deparment and i will guarantee you that if that department is present at hkust and hku, 90% or higher of the time hkust will be higher.”</p>
<p>Let’s look at a quite renown ranking table which is published by QS Top 200 Asian Universities 2009 about 3-4 weeks ago
<a href=“http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/asianuniversityrankings/asian_university_rankings_top_200_universities/[/url]”>http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/asianuniversityrankings/asian_university_rankings_top_200_universities/</a></p>
<p>This is for the overall ranking: For how they do it : (<a href=“http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/asianuniversityrankings/indicators00/simple_overview/[/url]”>http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/asianuniversityrankings/indicators00/simple_overview/</a>)</p>
<p>2009 rank School Name Country
Source: QS Quacquarelli Symonds (<a href=“http://www.qs.com%5B/url%5D”>www.qs.com</a>)
Copyright © 2004-2009 QS Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd.</p>
<p>1 University of HONG KONG Hong Kong
2 The CHINESE University of Hong Kong Hong Kong
3 University of TOKYO Japan
4 HONG KONG University of Science and Tech… Hong Kong
5 KYOTO University Japan
6 OSAKA University Japan
7 KAIST - Korea Advanced Institute of Scie… Korea, South
8 SEOUL National University Korea, South
9 TOKYO Institute of Technology Japan
10= National University of Singapore (NUS) Singapore
10= PEKING University China</p>
<p>(HKU)Overall Ranking - HKU - 1st ; HKUST 4th</p>
<p>The five major areas of academia
(HKU) Life Sciences & Bio Medicine: HKU - 6th ; HKUST - 11th
(HKU) Arts and Humanities: HKU - 5th ; HKUST - 47th
(HKUST) Natural Sciences: HKU - 17th ; HKUST - 11th
(HKU) Social Sciences: HKU - 6th ; HKUST - 16th
(HKUST) IT & Engineering: HKU - 17th ; HKUST - 6th</p>
<p>I think you should really check your facts before you become a bit too much.
I don’t think that suggests that its “90% of the time”</p>
<p>Both are excellent institutions in my view - in their own ways - but I just dislike people who make sweeping generalizations and being adamant in insisting one school is better than other - especially because of factual (admittedly rankings themselves are a bit biased- but I guess its as close as it gets) inaccuracy.</p>
<p>And that just took me 20 minutes of my sleep to read and reply.</p>