<p>Killer courseloads in the first two years seem fairly typical for students in physical sciences (who are not in the engineering school) as well as engineering, judging from what my two children have encountered. Also, these courses are usually graded on fairly steep curves, and in some classes the curve is averaged to a C. </p>
<p>At the more selective schools and in honors classes at state schools, very few students majoring in a math or science take their AP credits in those subjects, so it is not unusual for a class to be dominated by students who received a 5 on their AP exam and prestigious awards in the subject at hand, who are prepared to do little but study while school is in session. Many have participated in hobbies that have involved the subject matter for many years, coming into class with years of practical experience. IOW, even among students with similar credentials (grades, exam scores) or even raw “talent”, there is a wide variation in the amount of preparation in the subject matter, and this shows in the amount of studying that is necessary during freshman year. </p>
<p>This becomes even more obvious if the professor is inadequate or disorganized (some professors are also short on the executive function skills necessary to run an intro course) or the course is badly managed. My children had to learn gradually during freshman or sophomore year how to keep on top of material even if the professor is not teaching well.</p>
<p>Also, when classes are graded on a curve and the final grade is determined by two or three exams, it is often hard for students to even know how they are doing (or if their studying has been effective) until well into the semester. Sometimes even the student with the top grade has gotten only about half the problems correct on an exam. Knowing how to manage time and to keep going with difficult material even when the outcome seems uncertain is a skill that students in engineering programs seem to need. (OTOH, CS courses are set up so students get credit only if the program is completely debugged, and can be extremely time consuming even for talented students for that reason, so students need to plan for that.)</p>
<p>It is not difficult to find working engineers who have gotten several C’s or repeated one or more classes, but who have nonetheless gotten their degrees and gone on into the workplace. Ditto for engineering students who have gone on to ace the next course in a sequence after getting a C. It does seem to be good training to learn to work hard and then move on even if disappointed.</p>
<p>What I have noticed, however, with counselors who work with college students is that their degrees are rarely in engineering or physical sciences, and they have little understanding of how these courses work and the types of skills that are needed to succeed in them. TA’s can be hit or miss, too. My own children have found that it is helpful to work in peer groups, and also to use supplementary texts if the professor is not clear or the main text does not provide enough information.</p>