@alldaboston Feel free to look through the thread and make one. 
@Hamlin Yes, definitely. I did well enough with my dear 10-dollar-worth scientific calculators. As long as you know your calculator(s) intimately, youâll be fine.
@Frigidcold I think I have raw score of 43 which might be an 800 but might not be so Iâm wondering if retaking it if it turns out to be like a 790 would look bad
wait but the spheres have different radii, what if the smaller one is totally inside the larger one? wouldnât that be a sphere?
@benoitmandelbrot Theyâre sphere surfaces, not spheres.
Am I the only one who took the test without a graphing calculator and still ended up doing the graphing questions through calculus?
Does anyone remember what the sum of the first 3 terms of that geometric series was? I want to see if I made a mistake in my calculations and I forget what it equaled
Sum of first three terms was 60 with a common ratio of 5.
And the third term was 48.4
Should I cancel my scores if I think I will get a score of 720 or 740? I would like to go to Cornell for engineering
Did you guys get 3506a^2 for something.
it was asking to write XY in terms of A
@i2400ezpz yeah, I think it was 3675a^2, but definitely the largest choice.
@mumbai98 Yep. Me, too. I actually did pretty well without a graphing calculator, all things considered.
@i2400ezpz Yep.
did you guys get 10 for the minimum one? and -24 for the first one?
Whatâs the raw score needed for 760-790 for a not so nice curve? I might retake thisâŠ
@michelle426 same
Is it really that bad if you get less than an 800? So bad that its worth retaking?
@Tedeward Its not that bad, but since a lot of test takers do get 800s it could put you at a slight disadvantage.
Is y=square root of 1-x^2 symmetrical in respect to the origin?