<p>omg i made one careless spelling error! Woe is me!! chill out ppl...geez...i have things like waiting for my damn acceptances to worry about :(</p>
<p>lol guyfs i wuz in remmeedeal engrish :) </p>
<p>of course, my sat made up for it. but still!!</p>
<p>
[quote]
really its no biggie, your teacher wont lower your grade just because you don't pay attention to how you spell online.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Generally though, UCLA students who "do well" tend to spell correctly and refrain from Internet jargon.</p>
<p>in that case boelterhall, i will no longer use internet jargon and will spell correctly if UCLA accepts me :)</p>
<p>hahah we'll all see soon. Now that I think about it I'm kinda relieved I didnt get one, my semester grades werent too hot 3.6 LOL</p>
<p>so would a 3.9-4.0 (UC weighted) and a 1950 be an auto reject if i didn't get a supp. form? also, i want to switch my 1st and 2nd choice majors so is that still possible?</p>
<p>it depends. if ur uc gpa is between 3.9-4.0 then you have a problem. if you have a 4.0 or higher then you still are probably in good running.</p>
<p>Haberdashery, I</a> hope this gives you a better idea of where you stand. Also, the average UCLA admit has a high1900s/low2000s SAT score.</p>
<p>thanks! wow...11% chance based on weighted GPA, 30% based on SAT, and 58% based on ACT!!! (i didn't even send my ACT score cuz i've been told by counselors that UCs don't really care about ACT) what am i gonna do now?</p>
<p>Do you think having an unweighted 4.0 might compensate for my bad test scores (1950 SAT, 29 ACT)? It looks like the majority of people who apply have over a 4.0, but the number of people with an unweighted 4.0 is significantly lower.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Do you think having an unweighted 4.0 might compensate for my bad test scores (1950 SAT, 29 ACT)? It looks like the majority of people who apply have over a 4.0, but the number of people with an unweighted 4.0 is significantly lower.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Yes, but your weighted GPA is more important.
According to last year, I believe this was the case:</p>
<p>Weighted GPA > SAT II > EC > SAT I > Other</p>
<p>I believe SAT I scores were not accounted into consideration, or not very lightly, for the Class of '10. But this will definitely change this year, since the new class were not 'guinea pigs' of the new SAT.</p>
<p>^ Thanks... I have a solid weighted GPA (4.3) but I'm not sure it'll do me much good because my test scores are sort of dragging me down</p>
<p>Blah, I wish I had been an applicant last year... my stats almost exactly follow the order your mentioned in terms of their "strength"</p>
<p>wth..LOL sat I is that lihgtly taken...</p>
<p>Oh by the way, Bannana_girl, 'banana' isn't spelled that way. ;) just trying to help you out..</p>
<p>and bannana_girl, if you want to talk about SAT scores...both your SAT 2 scores are lower than both of mine. so yea...SAT's mean nothing, trust me.</p>
<p>oookkk</p>
<p>why don't we just stop the random/unnecessary/pointless insults people</p>
<p>C'mon guys, trying to insult people you don't even know isn't the best way to spend time here. </p>
<p>Boelter: Where did you hear that SAT Is were only factored in very lightly? I thought SAT IIs were considered more only if they had pertinence to your major.</p>
<p>Really, where did you hear that Jinobi?</p>
<p>Well, the Engineering site says its recommended to take SAT IIs in sciences if you're applying to Engineering. Therefore, it would seem logical that Engineering would look upon a Physics SAT II moreso than a English Lit SAT II. </p>
<p>At my school, it seemed that SAT Is were emphasized the most.</p>
<p>Boelter: Where did you hear that SAT Is were only factored in very lightly? I thought SAT IIs were considered more only if they had pertinence to your major.</p>
<p>Alright I keep hearing about people saying the diffrent ways our chosen major is impacted. I THOUGHT THE MAJOR DIDN"T MATTER in letters and science!!!</p>
<p>And also, can anybody confirm the SAT I not being weighted that much thing?</p>