<p>I went to a tier one top 50 LAC and I can say that in our dorm of freshmen, there were plenty of students who fell apart one way or another. Sure, there were a lot of "motivated and on the ball kind of kids" - but there was every other kind of variation around on campus as well. </p>
<p>Also, it is a mistake to think that academic vigour of a college campus or the peers will a keep an unbalanced student out of trouble. Freshman year is a stressful transition, and many students who had previously been able to keep their issues under some semblance of control had them explode into full blown crisises. </p>
<p>At my academically vigourous school full of motivated and wholesome students - we had fullblown eating disorders, a kid who had a psychotic break who thought he was a night-ninja and wore full body black and a mask and literally hid in bushes and stalk-ran-tumbled from hiding place to hiding place (scared the cr*p out of the student body until he was pulled in by the campus cops), druggies, professional drop-outs (skipping classes until kicked out a semester or two later), severely depressed kids, bipolar kids, alcoholics in the making kids, not to mention lots of experimenting with sex and sexuality kids, pregnant kids, etc. Computer addiction was just starting then (internet was fairly new - but I knew a group of kids who were pretty much 24/7 on IRC and text based MUDs and later MUSHs).</p>
<p>Do not think for one moment that the percentage of students who struggle with mental illnesses, breakdowns, risky behaviors, addictions and just generally falling apart is lower at a "good" college and/or that a strong academic lure works as a buffer. It does not. </p>
<p>It boils down again to that idea that picking the right environment for a student struggling with addiction issues (computers, the lure of pot, etc) is not a simple one. I understand you are trying to be positive, but in the process many of your statements sound too much like wishful thinking - a type of thinking that may be getting in the way of making an optimal set of boundaries and decisions with your son.</p>
<p>It is also false to think that a competitive environment is the one that your son will thrive in. High achievers sometimes will do better in a solid institution that allows a little bit of breathing room. There is a huge psychological difference between being naturally at the top of your class (big fish in a little pond) vs. the constant stress of having to prove oneself (little fish in a big pond). Don't discount the ills that come along with highly competitive schools and/or careers.</p>
<p>Annika</p>